FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGISTS

Cross-examination preparation
for forensic psychologists

PCL-R, HCR-20V3, Static-99R, MMPI-3, SVR-20. ForensicPrep simulates adversarial examination with instrument-specific precision. Because opposing counsel has read the same manuals you have.

Built by a forensic psychologist. For forensic psychologists.

Start 14-day free trial →

No credit card required

Live simulation: PCL-R cross-examination
ATY
Dr. Tedder, you scored the defendant a 28 on the PCL-R. Isn't a score of 25 considered the North American cutoff for psychopathy?
YOU
The cutoff varies by context. For research purposes, 30 is the standard threshold. For clinical and forensic use, the manual recommends considering the full score distribution rather than a single cutoff.
ATY
So you're applying a different standard than the test's own manual recommends?
YOU
Not at all. The manual explicitly states there is no single clinical cutoff and instructs evaluators to interpret scores in context. A score of 28 falls in an elevated range regardless of which threshold you apply.
ATY
You reviewed records for this evaluation. How many hours of collateral file review did you conduct?
YOU
Approximately twelve hours of file review across police reports, prior evaluations, institutional records, and treatment history.
ATY
And you had access to the victim's statements. Did you interview any collateral sources directly — family members, prior victims, correctional staff?
Continue this simulation →
What you'll face

The six attack vectors in forensic psychology testimony

01

Cutoff score challenges

Attorneys exploit PCL-R, Static-99R, and HCR-20 threshold ambiguity to imply you're applying non-standard criteria.

02

Collateral source adequacy

"You only reviewed records. You never spoke to a single person who actually knows this defendant." Practice holding this line.

03

Actuarial vs. clinical judgment

The tension between structured tools and professional override is a consistent attack vector in SVP and violence risk testimony.

04

Normative sample mismatch

Static-99R norms were developed on specific populations. Opposing counsel will argue your client doesn't match the validation sample.

05

Retaining party bias

"You've testified for the prosecution in 47 of your last 50 cases, haven't you, Doctor?" Know your numbers.

06

Daubert methodology

Error rates, peer review, general acceptance: every instrument you use needs a defensible Daubert answer.

Instrument coverage

The attorney knows your instruments. Do you know their challenges?

PCL-RPCL:YVHCR-20V3Static-99RStatic-2002RSVR-20MMPI-3MMPI-2-RFPAIVRAG-RLSI-RSIRS-2MacCAT-CATOMM

ForensicPrep's simulation engine understands the psychometric limitations, error rates, normative samples, and common challenges for every instrument in your battery, and uses them.

Start preparing today

14 days free. No credit card required.

Start free trial →
← All specialtiesCustody evaluators →Neuropsychologists →Psychiatrists →
Try the simulation →View pricing →